Weaponized Pedantry and Reverse Gish Gallop
In discussions, dismissing an argument due to minor details is a logical fallacy known as "weaponized pedantry". While precision is important, using small mistakes to invalidate a larger claim is unfair. Understanding logical fallacies can help in constructive discussions. It's crucial to assess whether a detail impacts the overall claim and to maintain fairness and neutrality in the assessment. The goal should be to understand different perspectives and reach common ground, rather than winning. Engage in discussions with a dedication to accuracy, but be mindful of disguising biased advocacy as precision.